![]() |
|
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
So... you think my weight loss diet is unconventional and too liberal to be successful? Excellent! That sets my strategy aside from most others! I created this individual approach with the intent of being different than what most diet plans out there encourage. I've never been satisfied with bare minimum anything and that's probably why low-calorie diets never sat well with me. I have experimented with and witnessed so many yo-yo, fads and unreasonable plans that I felt the need to create my own method of weight loss. While I respect and practice many of the knowledgeable recommendations by experts and the food industry alike, I'm a rebel and just had to take a little from here and there to form my own plan; a plan that I could live in perfect harmony with. A plan that I could stick to for the rest of my life and actually works for me! Who am I? A doctor? Nutritionist? Dietitian? Nurse? Scientist? Mathematician? Ha! Nope! Not even close. I'm just a chunky monkey that decided to take control of my weight and overall health without giving up the foods that I love. And isn't love all about devotion and compromise? Absolutely! That's why my relationship with food is undergoing some serious changes but we're definitely staying together! LOL I'm a 28 year old (December 12th, 1979) very happily married web designer, Internet marketing strategist and computer-programmer-in training that lives in Atlanta, GA at the moment. My husband, mother, and our 7 cats (yes, 7!) moved here from Upstate, NY last year. We're eagerly moving back to Upstate, NY as soon as possible. My husband is a computer software engineer that sets his own hours like I do, so we both have the luxury-curse of being self-employed and working at home. My husband is a freak of nature; he rarely gets hungry and has never had to deal with being overweight. Until he met me of course LOL. He was super skinny and lived mainly off of caffeinated beverages when we first met and now he's steadily gaining, but not in need of weight loss at this time. He's actually been maintaining a healthy weight gain for quite awhile now. *pouts* Yes, I am terribly jealous. If only we could do a metabolism exchange... *plots* heh! I, on the other hand, need to lose a considerable amount of weight. All the years of working at home on my computer hours, upon hours a day and poor eating habits has contributed greatly to my fluffiness. I'm mostly Italian and grew up in a traditional Italian home with an overabundance of food. In fact, until I was 18 my family owned a farm market and ice cream stand that served all sorts of junk food and homemade Gelato. Although, we rarely had any type of store-bought junk food at home, we did have a lot of rich, delicious homemade foods. We grew a lot of our own vegetables, were surrounded by neighboring apple orchards, ate whole grain breads, and practiced many other healthy habits. In fact you'd never find Kraft anything or Little Debbie in our house, but for every healthy food you would find, you would find a devilishly decadent dish or dessert; such as rigatoni with meat sauce, eggplant parmesan, something overflowing with ricotta, etc. So you can imagine the relentless temptation and lifestyle I have struggled with all my life. *sigh* I adore food. It's a beautiful thing! It's a hobby, a passion, and an enemy all at the same time. It's all around us in the US and we need it to survive. You want to quit smoking? You can stop buying cigarettes. You want to quit drinking alcohol? You can stop buying a 6 pack of beer on the way home. You want to lose weight? It gets a bit trickier because you can't NOT buy or avoid food indefinitely. It's mandatory for survival, so it's not going away anytime soon. Thankfully! For decades doctors and the diet industry made the whole weight loss gig seem like total deprivation. I grew up believing a diet meant salad, celery, and water. I have actually heard a doctor recommend: "No bread, no pasta, no cookies, no soda, no cake, no jams, no jellies... etc." WHAT? Are you kidding me? That's harsh! And why? I have seen "thin people" eat all of the above as long as I can remember, so why shouldn't someone with extra weight be able to do the same while losing weight? Most can and SHOULD! In my opinion anyway. Before you think I'm completely out of my mind, no, I don't believe you should eat 1500 calories worth of cookies and soda per day to lose weight. I believe in moderation with healthy choices at least 90% of the time and 10% or so as a margin of error for the not-so-healthy options. It is unrealistic to believe that most people can do everything right 100% of the time; especially when it comes to food choices. I'm sure millions of people remember Susan Powter and her "Stop The Insanity!" mantra in the 1990s. Her infomercials and time in the spotlight may have faded from our minds, but the catch-phrase still makes me nod in agreement. Growing up in the '80s, liquid diets were all the rage. Then in the '90s, diet pills and weight loss surgery became more and more popular. Followed by the parade of boxed fad diets and 24 hour miracle juice concoctions. There's probably thousands of methods being marketed, but few work and many are dangerous and down right ridiculous. Some promise to lose 20 pounds in 20 days, but none tell you that you will gain 30 pounds back when you go off it and revert back to eating the way you were. In our pursuit of the "perfect body", we tend to neglect the basics of health, nutrition and sanity. I know I did for a long time. I didn't realize that a healthy mind and spirit is just as important as a healthy body. For the longest time I believed that losing weight meant virtually starving yourself, lots of exercise, and abandoning all flavor and treats in your life. I often ignored sensible advice that said, "Just eat healthy and get some exercise." No, I wasn't willing to accept such an easy solution. I had all the answers. I thought I knew how to lose weight but I'd put it off until this day or that day. That "day" never came. The miracle potion that you take before bed and wake up thin was never invented. As far back as I can remember, I was led to believe that it's feast or famine. I would fast for a few days in a row or reduce my calories down to almost nothing countless times in an attempt to be a string bean; believing that would make the weight come off a kazillion times faster. Little did I know how much worse I was making it. I had no idea that not eating enough can make you gain weight! I have never heard of such a thing and was stunned when I heard that. Obviously all of my deprivation tactics failed miserably. Of course I was never anorexic, being I would only attempt to do what I thought was a diet for a short amount of time before giving up, due to being hungry and whiney the entire time. I have since learned that your body needs X amount of calories (energy) each day to survive depending on your height, weight, age, activity level, and gender. This is called your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) and can be calculated by several formulas, one of the more popular being the Harris Benedict Formula. Harris J, Benedict F. A biometric study of basal metabolism in man. Washington D.C. Carnegie Institute of Washington. 1919 Commonly it's about 1200 for women and 1800 for men, just for your organs to function and your blood to flow! Those estimated figures only represent the calories needed for you to lay in bed all day and don't even include the calories you use getting up, walking, going up and down stairs, going to your car, checking the mail, chewing your food OR lean body mass. We sometimes forget that breathing, sleeping, thinking, walking to the bathroom, lifting bags of groceries, digesting food, and etc. all REQUIRE fuel, aka calories (kilocalorie). (Children and teenagers go by an entirely different set of caloric needs as they are still growing. Anyone under the age of 18 should seek the advice of a doctor or registered dietitian before attempting any kind of diet.) When we eat less than or burn more than our minimum requirement for several weeks/months or years, our bodies become super efficient fuel burning machines. Also referred to as "starvation mode", "famine response" or "conservation mode." Back in more primative times when we had to forage for our food or go without for long periods of time, the human body evolved to slow down our metabolism in an effort to keep us alive until we could eat again. So when we don't eat enough, our body acts as if it is being starved and isn't going to get food ever again, so it holds onto as much stored fat as it can. When you eat only say 800 calories a day, instead of your body using them exclusively, you will use those 800 calories plus your body will also utilize your muscles and possibly tissue from organs to compensate, which eventually leads to weight gain, muscle loss, internal damage, and/or weight plateaus as your body loses muscle and hangs on to your body fat for dear life. You might lose weight the first 2 to 4 weeks, maybe even months or a year, but eventually it will come to a screeching halt, especially if you are very active. Analogy: Your metabolism is a lot like a furnace. When you don't add fuel to the fire, it dwindles down to a slow simmer; still burning but producing much less heat and energy. If you add fuel to the fire, it roars and outputs much more heat. So just like you want to keep a fire burning hot, you want your metabolism to burn with optimal intensity by sufficiently feeding your body. One thing I noticed is that people tend to throw around and fear "starvation mode" prematurely. It does NOT happen on Tuesday because you skipped lunch on Monday! It doesn't set in because you had an extremely busy week when 18 family members dropped in while your house was undergoing renovations and you only ate a salad and small bag of pretzels in between caring for your doggy that had a stomach virus in the midst of all the other chaos. Nay nay! It's a slow, gradual process. Some people don't even believe the process happens because there aren't any published studies that show this specific result. But it is known that dipping too low slows down your metabolism, decreases thyroid output and causes loss of lean body mass (muscle). So just knowing the basic laws of energy balance and using a little common sense, it is safe to say that it does occur. Maybe not as easily as some believe, but it is real and highly logical. Some ask, "Well, how do anorexics get so thin?" Simple. Extreme starvation, maybe 100 or 200 calories a day. Eventually their body starts eating itself. Muscles wear down, heart becomes weak etc. Very pleasant thought. *sarcasm* Not the right thing to do, ever, ever, EVER! Surprisingly enough, anorexics might look thin but have very high body fat and little muscle. Why? Because the first things to go in 'starvation' are your muscles, then tissue from organs etc. Fat is often the last thing to go when habitually under-eating. Realistically, I'm sure most of us have had days here and there when we simply forget or don't have time to eat everything that we should. Whatever the reason may be, a day or 2 of eating too little is unlikely to have a major impact on your metabolism. Our metabolism doesn't go off and on as easily as a light switch. If you want to go by a timeframe, pay attention to what happens over a week or more at a time. Luckily, our body doesn't recognize a 24 hour sequence of events with absolute precision. If it did... oh geez! *shudders* Over the past few years I have been doing a lot of research; knowledge is a fantabulous thing! I've learned that nearly everything I knew about weight loss and physical fitness was all wrong! At the same time, a lot of things started to make sense. I see some people eat very little and not lose or even gain weight and now I understand why because I have a much better understanding of the human body and metabolism. While I don't know everything, I must say, I'm pretty well armed with a plethora of information on the subject. Liquid diets, fat free diets, low carb diets, starvation, detox diets, fad diets, stomach surgeries, pills... blah, blah, blah. All the science, money, chemicals, research, and technology amounts to nothing because in the end it all boils down to simple math. Calories in vs. Calories out -- ! There aren't any simple, effective, and healthy strategies to losing weight besides burning more calories than you consume. Does that mean giving up foods like bread, pasta, and cookies forever? Absolutely not! It just means, you have to create a deficit. That deficit should look something like 500 less calories from your maintenance calories per day to lose 1lb per week (3,500 calories = 1lb). This deficit can be created by cutting down on what you eat and drink by 500 calories less, a mixture of diet and exercise, or even just more exercise. (Consume 250 less calories a day + exercise equaling 250 calories a day or burn 500 calories more each day with exercise) Example for a 5'3", moderately active (60 mins exercise 3 to 5 days/week), 30 year old female: Current
weight: 150lbs -- Example for a 5'3", moderately active (60 mins exercise 3 to 5 days/week), 30 year old female: Current
weight: 175lbs -- Example for a 5'3", moderately active (60 mins exercise 3 to 5 days/week), 30 year old female: Current
weight: 300lbs -- Example for a 5'10", moderately active (60 mins exercise 3 to 5 days/week), 30 year old male: Current
weight: 200lbs -- Example for a 5'10", moderately active (60 mins exercise 3 to 5 days/week), 30 year old male: Current
weight: 300lbs Your maintenance calories and calories to lose might need be adjusted with every 10lb to 15lb loss, to ensure the most accurate range for your height, age, gender, and activity level, but if it ain't broken, don't fix it! And if you add more exercise, your calories should increase to reflect that upgrade or if you twist your ankle and no longer jump rope for 7 hours a day, you might wanna kick it down a few. Keep in mind that there is no miracle number. Each person is different and you might have to experiment and modify accordingly. Maybe you have more lean muscle mass than others, more house work, yard work, more sitting, less general movement, etc. etc -- it really is an individual formula but the general estimates typically aren't too far off. So I would use them as a guideline but include or exclude variables specific to you and your lifestyle. Remember, the more you exercise, the more you need to eat. More exercise doesn't equal more weight loss if you don't eat enough to keep from entering "starvation mode" aka PLATEAU -- !! There IS a such thing as too much exercise and many people often make that mistake. They are eating 1200 calories a day AND doing intense cardio 5 or more days a week. Tsk tsk! Give your body and mind the fuel it needs and it will respond. I think the "1200 calorie minimum" is thrown out there way too often and many dieters get stuck on that number; as though it's the right one for everybody. Not so. If you are lifting weights you might gain muscle and muscle weighs more than fat because of its density (see image below). You might look thinner, but weigh more than you did 2 or 3 months ago because you gained muscle. This is a good thing! Don't freak out about weight gain if you don't consider the possibility that it could be muscle. Muscle burns more calories than fat, so it needs more calories to subsist. Which means you have to feed them well!
I notice that women tend to avoid lifting weights because they fear they will 'bulk up' and look like a man. That is a myth. It is nearly impossible for women to gain as much muscle as a man without altering their hormones with steroids. We simply aren't designed the same way men are and we will not naturally gain muscle the same way men do. Even men have a hard time gaining bodybuilder type of muscles without vigorous training and steroid enhancement. So, girls... that means we can hit the weights without fear of turning into Arnold Schwarzenegger. Yay! Losing "weight" can be a vague term as well, because there are different types of weight in your body; muscle weight, fat weight, and water weight. Fat loss is the ultimate way to go. Some water weight is good to get rid of, but not to the point of dehydration. Let's not forget that water retention can make our weight fluctuate from 1 to 10lbs at any given time! Ladies, we experience this all too often. *grumbles* You will find millions of web sites on the Internet that all tell you one thing or another about losing weight. I've probably read most of them lol. Then there's many people with uneducated opinions, theories, and strategies *rolls eyes* all over forums and blogs. With so many different things out there, it's hard to decide which approach you want to take and what is right and wrong. It seems that 'everybody' is an expert because they read an article on WebMD and so many of them will tell you why something is wrong, but at the same time they can't prove that it's not wrong or even give you a better solution. It seems that some people spend so much time trying to prove others wrong, that they don't even take the time to find out what makes them right. Being argumentative is fine, when you have cause and effect to back up your argument. Otherwise, it's just a difference of opinion -- and even the most reputable scientists on the face of the Earth have conflicting opinions of certain matters. Personally, I got to the point where I said, "I want to lose weight but I'm not going to make myself miserable in the process." I gave up on the notion that I can lose all the weight I want in a week or a month. I have come to accept that losing weight fast is not healthy, practical, nor is it effective in the long run. I'm sure most people want to be slim and trim in the shortest amount of time and some can be, but at what expense? Being a prisoner in your own body? Losing lean muscle mass? Or losing it all only to gain it all back again? I know once I lose weight, I sure as heck don't want to find it again. I think some people forget that once you lose weight, you actually have to keep working at it to keep it off. That's why there's no rush and why deprivation only works in the short-term. For weight loss to be truly successful, you have to do it in a way that you can live with for the rest of your life. I know for a long time I thought about getting to my goal weight but never gave a second thought to the maintenance afterwards. You cannot eat anything and everything you want when you get to your goal weight without gaining weight. Again, simple math. Now that I am more informed, I have present and future plans that I can live with. Honestly, being fat does not bother me as far as being happy with myself. If people could be fat AND healthy, without it raising other health risks, I would be content being pleasantly plump! I never judged anyone based on their shape, size, color, or any other outer appearance. Just because a person is bigger than another does not mean they are a bad, lazy and/or an apathetic person. I believe that judging someone based on their size is as shallow as judging someone solely on the clothes they wear or car they drive. If someone is very thin but wears old clothes, that are "out of style" and drives an old broken down car, does that somehow make them a bad or lazy person? Certainly not. How superficial do you have to be to actually answer 'yes' to that? lol Of course I'd like to be thinner for my own vanity, but what looks good to me or you may not look good to someone else. Beauty really is in the eye of the beholder! I say all the time in my poutiest, most self-pitying voice, "I'm fat and yuck!", to which my husband replies, "You're fine!" (how sweet is he?) I could probably be 6000lbs and he'd still say the same thing. He's such an enabler! LOL Kidding, he supports whatever makes me happy. Fat, skinny, or somewhere in between... and that just goes to show you, what is gross and repulsive to me, isn't to someone else. I know I am really hard on myself (isn't everyone? lol) but at the same time, I know that I'm cuter than a million buttons!! LOL My husband came up with that one. Society has led most of the world to believe that thin is in and that fat is unattractive. Again, matter of taste and everyone is entitled to their own preferences. To me, short, tall, fat, skinny, yellow, or purple... it doesn't matter. However, as I get older and wiser, health is becoming one of my top priorities. What's on the outside doesn't matter nearly as much as what is going on inside of my body. Some say it's a lifestyle change and others simply call it a diet. Both terms are correct. You are changing your lifestyle and your diet is changing. A diet doesn't only mean weight loss. I know from experience my diet has included very poor food choices and habits. So the word diet is not taboo to me at all. I know when I arrive at the weight I want to be, I will continue to be on a diet to maintain that weight and healthy lifestyle. I also believe in indulgence every once in a while. A birthday, a wedding, a vacation, a party, a celebration, the holidays or even a typical Wednesday! Millions of people live long, healthy lives and do you think most of them never ever have a Snickers or pizza or ice cream? You are seriously misguided if you think the occasional pigout or rich treat will alter your entire weight loss diet or health for the duration of your life. Of course I want to be thinner and healthy, but I am human and believe in enjoying life and the food that's in it. One day of overeating doesn't matter nearly as much as what you eat over several days. If you eat everything in sight one day, it's ok! You can make up for it the next day and all the days after it! It's not the end of your weight loss journey. Your body isn't running an exact 24 hour clock. Even if you go on vacation for a week or so and totally abandon your weight loss mission, so what? Really. So what?! You gained 5 lbs. Oh, heavens... noooooo!! C'mon. That's life and you cannot feel guilty about living it. Just pick up right where you left off. Just because you took a detour doesn't mean that you won't end up at your destination. Realistically, you would have to eat about 17,500 calories above your maintence calories to gain 5lbs of fat. That can be easy to do, but guilt is counter-productive. You have to accept what is done and move forward from there. While I wouldn't suggest eating anything and everything every other day, I do think it's acceptable to indulge every few weeks. I think it's alright to go overboard on a vacation. I don't believe Thanksgiving or Christmas are meant for calorie counting. I don't think anyone should eat rice cakes at their child's birthday party! Going out to a restaurant shouldn't always include the small garden salad with a drop of dressing and water with lemon. Everything in moderation and even if moderation turns into an 18 hour feast, pick up the slack the next day and several days after that. Getting depressed or self-loathing will not take back the calories that you consumed. Eating balanced meals, snacks and exercise over the next days and weeks to follow will. When I first started my weight loss diet in June 2007, I was interested in the Weight Watchers Flexpoints system. I did a lot of reading online about it and found myself fond of their fundamentals but decided to make my own version by simple calorie counting because I would probably be out of Points by lunchtime. So then I designed a diet plan based on calorie reduction and ate a lot of processed foods, like frozen dinners and "100 Calorie" packs of assorted portion controlled treats and snacks. A few weeks into it, I realized most of the food I was consuming was more like a science experiment instead of nourishment. There are so many products that are just ridden with sodium, fat, and refined carbohydrates. I still have some of the junky processed stuff once in awhile, but I try to stick as close to nature as possible. I've fallen in love with many natural-state, organic, and/or unprocessed foods. I love to browse the 'health food' section at stores that I once thought were reserved for hippies, buy healthier, untainted foods online and even make my own healthy versions of their evil counterpart. I really enjoy cooking, baking, and being creative with real food. Don't get me wrong, I still have some of the unhealthy things, but the majority of the time I am staying with and sincerely enjoying the best things our wonderful planet has to offer. Sure, I might have a Big Mac again sometime down the road but I prefer real food the majority of the time. I'm not one of those "former smokers/bad eaters/alcoholics" that turns into an elitist and puts down certain behavior or choices. Life is too short to make petty judgements. Keep your judgements substantial LOL! As you may or may not have noticed, I am obsessed with food. It's one of my greatest passions and hobbies. I love it in every way imaginable. I don't discriminate! LOL It's fun, it's relaxing, and it's even educational. I know, I know, a lot of people say "Food shouldn't be a luxury, it's a necessity." True, it is a necessity but just because it's our fuel, doesn't mean you can't take the time to savor the flavor, texture, and aroma. If food wasn't meant to be appealing to the senses, we wouldn't be able to taste a sweet, ripe peach or crunchy walnuts. If it was meant to be just a form of fuel, it might as well be tasteless. That's my theory and I'm sticking to it. *giggles*
Through ongoing research and experimentation, I developed a system that isn't like any other I have seen. I took a little bit from every proven fact, theory, and opinion I have encountered and applied it to a plan that works for me. Every person is different and every diet is different. What works for me, may not work for you and vice versa. I eat almost everything that I love by finding a way to work it into the calories that I allotted myself, making a healthier version of it, or by having it on what I call a "no counting day." The only things I try to avoid are overly-processed foods, artificial sweetners, sodium, bad fats, and empty calories. Sounds very limited, but I assure you it's really not. I'm an avid label reader. It's really easy to look on the package for the nutritional information, check the calories, sodium, fat, and ingredients. The calories and fat aren't as important to me as the sodium content. I'm prone to retaining water and sodium is my arch nemesis! I also look for artificial sweeteners (aspartame, saccharin, sucralose, etc. etc.) and high fructose corn syrup. I prefer foods not contain these things. Not just for the health risks they may or may not impose, but because the taste is just blek -- ! Have the real thing and satisfy your craving without feeling guilty. Work it in! Food labels are a bit misleading if you don't know how to properly decipher them. The calories and other counts apply to what the serving size is. Sometimes they get tricky, so you have to look at the serving size closely. Example: many bagel packages say a serving is HALF of a bagel. Which mean the calories you see are only half of what you will typically eat. Who the heck really eats just half of an English muffin or bagel? lol Certainly not me. I'm a carb addict. I simply love bread, pasta, etc. So I definitely couldn't handle being on one of the popular low-carb diets, like Atkins or South Beach for long periods of time. I might take a day or 2, maybe a week to reduce my carb (sugar, grains etc.) intake to change things up a bit, but I could never stick with that type of plan for weeks or months at a time. I'd be bored to death and end up bingeing on a pound of pasta and 3 boxes of chocolate chip cookies after awhile. I don't believe in having food group limitations and "rules"; I much prefer to keep a lot of variety in my diet so I don't miss things that I enjoy. Besides, your body and brain especially, need good carbs. My strategy: I used to think when it came to weight loss that fast = better, but I no longer think like that. I'm in a marathon, not a sprint. I decided I want to lose it slower so that I am never feeling deprived or losing too much muscle mass, avoiding malnourishment, keeping it off in the long run, and possibly avoiding flabby skin. Some say losing it too fast (i.e. stomach surgery or eating too little) will cause you to lose too much muscle and not give your skin the time it needs to adjust to the changes. I don't know if that is true or not but I am sure that genetics play a big role in that outcome. I haven't gotten to that stage yet, but if taking it slow helps even a teensy weensy bit, I'll go with that. On a day to day basis, I try to eat a reasonable balance of fruits, vegetables, proteins, grains, fats, and sweets spread out over 5 to 7 small meals/snacks. If I miss my targets once in awhile, again, that's ok with me. And so far, this approach has worked very well for me! Calorie cycling: I create my calorie deficit based on a method that I first read about while researching Weight Watchers online. I first found it called the Wendie Plan, then I have seen it referred to as zigzag dieting, calorie cycling, and up day/down day. Like I said previously, your body doesn't keep a 24 hour stop watch. Your body burns calories round the clock; even when sleeping. The theory: "Eat anything 3 hours before bed and it will turn to fat." is a MYTH! That does NOT happen. It's what you eat and your activity over the course of several days that matters most, so why not take full advantage of that angle? When I see people say they eat dinner at 6:00PM and won't eat anything after that because they "know it turns to fat", I feel compelled to set them straight. Maybe they think their metabolism is a pumpkin that will turn food into fat at midnight? *giggles* I think the recommendation to avoid mindless nightime snacking in front of the TV was twisted into that wild myth. For the first month of my weight loss journey I decided I would do 1500 calories per day. This worked out well, but after reading about calorie cycling, I decided that it sounded better than the same exact amount of calories everyday because it still creates a deficit over a period of several days and allows more wiggle room for day to day life. I loved the idea of having a flexible diet instead of being stuck on the same exact pattern every single day. At that point, a whole new world of opportunity opened up to me. After cycling my calories for over 4 months now, I'm happy to report that calorie cycling has had the same effect on me as creating a deficit with a static amount of calories... ongoing weight loss! Yay for courageous experiments! I also decided that 1500 calories wasn't enough calories for my weight and activity. Remember, eating too little will send you into 'starvation mode' or hit a plateau sooner than you'd like and I'm content losing 0.5lb to 2lbs a week because my whole approach is to go at it slow but steady and remember that any loss is great! So, I rearranged my calories to average 1829 calories per day or 12,800 per week. My weekly plan looks like this: Sunday:
1800 calories Seems like a lot? It's really not! Even if I weighed 125lbs right now and wanted to maintain that weight, exercising 5 days a week, I'd need 2019 calories per day (14,133 per week) to do so. So at 1829 calories a day on average, a 27 year old female weighing 125lbs + exercise, there would still be a small deficit; without factoring in lean body mass. At my current weight, I'm definitely creating a deficit with 1829 calories plus my activity level and if need be, I will continue to add more activity to my life before and after I reach my goal weight to continue enjoying foods I love and not regain what I have lost. To be honest, I probably burn less than 1000 calories a week with exercise as of October 2007, because the weight is still coming off at a steady pace and I do not want to lose it any faster. Somedays I'll only do 1/2 a mile on my elliptical, other days I'll go 30 to 60 minutes on the highest resistance. I will do 2 miles everyday for 6 days in a row or skip exercise all together for 4 or 5 days in a row. I don't skip it too often, but I do think changing it up so often has its own benefits because my body is never getting used to one thing or another. The more weight I lose, the easier and more rewarding exercise, especially cardio, is becoming. I enjoy it more than I did when I weighed 10lbs, 20lbs more etc. And I imagine that I will feel even better doing it when I lose even more. Right now I try to get 3 or 4 days of cardio; anywhere from 5 minutes to 60 minutes worth. Elliptical trainer, going up and down stairs, walking, heavy cleaning, etc. If and when I get to a point where I don't lose anything for a month or 2 at a time, I'm sure my strategy will change a little bit but my basic program will remain in tact and as long as it's still working, I will keep doing it the same. If I gain, I will lose again. Weight doesn't have to be permanent in either direction! Calorie estimates are just a guideline because this isn't an exact science. These are my target calories and my target activity level for the week. If I go under or above on either target, that's ok! Nobody consumes or expends the exact same number of calories each day. It's nearly impossible. I might have to climb 5 more flights of stairs than expected on any given day, and voilà... I just expended more calories than the day before. lol There are too many variables to obsess with every diminutive detail. I just try to cast a net of target variables and stay within those boundaries. If I come out with a positive result at the end of the month (I always do), I'm satisified. Sometimes I obsess and weigh myself daily, but most of the time I try to weigh myself weekly or bi-monthly. If I stay the same weight for a week or go up 3 or 4 lbs, I compare it to the month prior and have always seen an average weight loss over 4 to 6 weeks. So just like a 24 hour period of events doesn't matter as much as what happens over 7 days; 7 days doesn't matter as much as what happens over a 30 day period. It's all about balance and averages. Ironically, math was never my strong suit, but I manage to keep a firm grasp on my metabolic numbers. The "1200 calorie" minimum: To reiterate, that figure is the bare minimum that human adults, mainly females, need per day just for their body to run itself. Of course there are exceptions for shorter people, like my mom, who is only 4'11", but also has a lot of muscles and curves. Even she is pretty hungry on just 1200 cals. Somewhere along the line the number 1200 has become the focus of a lot of dieter's. While I agree you shouldn't dip below this number, I also don't think you have to hover around it to lose weight, especially the fellas. Men are in a league of their own when it comes to weight loss. They naturally have more lean body mass to aid them in their quest. Girls, we can optimize our bodies with lean body mass too! So don't feel left out. Of course 1200 calories can be satisfying if you plan your meals ahead of time with nutritious and filling foods, but I don't believe a grown adult should have to subsist on 1200 calories day after day, after boring, monotaneous day. When I cycle my calories, I have a 1200 cal day here and there, and usually on those days I am a hungrier than my higher calorie days. The day after the 1200 calorie day, I'm ravenous! 1200 calories per day, everyday, is not enough for me or many others. Especially if exercise is mixed into the equation! Unless you plan on doing nothing but lying in bed 24 hours a day or you currently weigh 115lbs and want to weigh 110lbs, eating only 1200 calories a day is not going to benefit your weight loss efforts as much as eating close to your target maintenance calories, plus exercise. Eating at or close to your target maintenance calories?! Huh? What does that mean? It means: If you're 35 years old, female, 5'5", your target weight is 130lbs, you have a desk job, you have moderate activity at home, such as cooking, cleaning, running errands, and you do cardio about 4 days a week, maybe some weight lifting, you would need: 2008
calories/day to maintain that weight -- So if you weigh 180lbs right now and you want to weigh 130lbs, you can safely eat up to 2008 calories on average per day, without gaining weight, if you have moderate activity and exercise! Maybe a little more, maybe a littles less depending on your body's composition and lean body mass. That's just a rough estimate, but it looks much more livable to me than a mere 1200 calories! Humans are designed to move; we're designed to hunt and gather. Move as often as possible, keep your metabolism going. Even if you sit at your computer most of the day like I do, keep fidgeting, bounce your legs, get up and take a stroll every 15 minutes or so. And most importantly, keep building muscle! Our metabolisms slow down with age in part because we lose lean body mass (muscle) as our bodies deteriorate. If we keep building, maintaining, and feeding it properly, our metabolism could be that of a 30 year old when we're 60. Sure, genetics might play a big role in that but you can hack your genetics and work around most weak points. So if good health, a longer lifespan, and younger appearance are what you desire, lift weights, do cardio, eat plenty of good foods, forgive yourself when you don't, and that's how your "diet" becomes a lifestyle. Free days: I call them no counting or free days... they are also called cheat days! I replace my high day 2800 calorie day (usually Wednesdays) with a free day every 2 weeks or so. Why do I take them? Simply put, to have a break and keep my sanity. It would be unrealistic and unwise to count every single calorie and limit myself to NEVER having anything unhealthy to eat or drink in my life ever again. I think that's silly and totally unnecessary, especially when eating healthfully the majority of the time. I love my weight loss diet just like some people love their job, but every once in awhile you take a day off from work, right? I'm dedicated to and enjoy my hard efforts at maintaining a sensible diet most of the time, but I leave maybe 10% or less open for not-so-healthy food and beverage choices. I'm only human and I like to go out to a restaurant with my huband on occassion or cook an all day feast and not count the calories. There's absolutely nothing wrong with this, because I get right back on track the next day and actually look forward to it after a day of over-stuffing myself with things I don't normally eat. I typically don't have more than 2800 calories on "cheat days", I just allow myself to eat whatever I want, regardless of how disgustingly fattening (delicious) it might be. If I do have more than 2800, even 4000 calories, oh well. Such is life. I try to increase my activity a bit on days I know I'm going to over-indulge and it all works out in the end. I like to refer to it as load balancing. And again, calories in Vs. calories out. I go easy the day before and the day after, I do some heavy cardio, HIIT, etc. and my metabolism might even get shocked into high gear. I know that some people take a 'cheat day' and freak out when they see 2 or 3 lbs on the scale the day after. Well, duh! That's just water and undigested food weight. In order to gain 3 lbs of fat, you would have to eat 10,500 calories OVER your maintenance calories. I don't know about you, but that's not a cheat day to me... that's a suicide mission! Yikes! Whatever my intake for that day may be, I accept it and move on. I'm not saying I inhale 12 pieces of fried chicken, 2lbs of M&Ms, and 6 Whoppers from BK -- but I can rack up calories pretty good and I'm sure most people could if they think about it. Example of not a lot of food but a lot of calories: (rough estimate) Breakfast: Lunch: Snack: Dinner: After-dinner
cocktails: Grand total: (approx.) 4423 calories In one
sitting, all of this food might be impossible to ingest, but from waking
up at 6:00AM to 11:00PM at night, it's really easy to spread those "small
meals" out and take them all in. My philosophy: Like I said above, I'm a big believer in eating at or close to your desired maintenance calories from the very beginning. Go ahead and figure out your ideal weight, do the math estimate for your personal variables, such as age and activity level -- then eat within that range and more than likely you will get to where you want to be. Of course your goal weight will take longer to achieve and not to sound repetitive, but what is the rush? It sounds cliché, but we didn't gain all of our weight overnight, so why should we lose it overnight? I know, I know -- you have an upcoming event that you want to be in tip top shape for. Nothing wrong with that! I've had that feeling of urgency on and off for decades, but I am done stressing myself out in the name of perfection. The show is going to go on with or without me being my ideal weight. So, why do I cycle my calories even though there's no scientific proof that supports this method? The theory of calorie cycling is to keep your metabolism guessing and being this is a life-plan, I can't imagine eating a set amount of calories everyday for the rest of my life. If you eat 1500 or 1200 or 1800 calories everyday, it makes sense that your metabolism gets used to it. Keep it on its toes by staying in the range that's right for your age, height, weight, activity level, and gender and you probably won't hit a plateau. Of course it's a possibility, but everyone is different. I think what a lot of people fail to realize is that the majority of "skinny" people already cycle their calories. Either subconsciously or deliberately, they know if they overeat one day, to take it easy the day after. It just comes naturally to a lot of people. The pattern of overeating for several days, weeks, months, and years in a row is one of the factors that could cause one to become overweight. If you practice the concept of calorie balance that some of the lifelong skinny people do, your results are bound to be similar. Now, doesn't that make even more sense? However, some people don't calorie cycle properly, which makes it pointless. They don't have a wide enough gap in between calories to give their body a difference that it will notice and sometimes they simply don't eat enough. I give myself I wide range from high to low, but not extremely low (re: less than 1200/day). Some people do: 1200, 1300, 1250, 1400, 1500, 1250, 1450 -- while that IS different each day, it's not significant enough to "trick" your metabolism into high gear. If possible, I think people should eat more and exercise more! Again, that 1200 calorie guideline is just a figure, it's not the divine number. While I haven't come across any scientific research that collaborates calorie cycling with being more successful than typical calorie reduction and exercise, I have read expert opinions that state it [calorie cycling] does not have an ill effect. I mainly base my plan and theory on the experience and input of those who have had success doing it this way. Myself being one of them. Just because science and medicine hasn't proved or documented something, doesn't mean that it doesn't work or exist. Where would the world be today without some of the most incredible amateur discoveries? Again, I'm not a scientist or even a dietitian, but I can take facts and use common sense to form a pretty enlightening interpretation of my metabolism. If I do hit a plateau, I could readjust my calories and/or activity. I'll probably just take a break from dieting and exercise all together for a week and then get back to it. I have read that taking a week-long break every 3 to 4 months has worked for some and hopefully that will work in my favor as well. Alas, I will cross that bridge when I get to it and I'll keep in mind that it's not the end of the world or even the end of my weight loss. Less negative thoughts, more food than the average diet plan offers, more exercise, more freedom, less advice from crazy plans and uninformed people, more natural foods, less over-processed foods, more breaks, more common sense, more "gut instincts", less guilt, and more patience is a great recipe for successful, long term weight loss, maintenance, and health. My plan in short:
I hope I have amused and maybe even inspired whomever may stumble upon this little blog of mine. Losing weight can be a great challenge that you can find fun in. Some people might say I am obsessed with this, but I see this as a game. I'm keeping score and trying to win by losing. Don't take it all too seriously, remember to live it up once in awhile! Do what works for you and your lifestyle. Always seek the advice of your doctor, dietitian, nutritionist, and/or other health care provider before starting any type of diet. I wouldn't want to encourage anyone to follow my philosophy if it somehow jeopardizes their well-being! Especially if they have a pre-existing condition or doctor prescribed plans to follow. I'm sure as time goes by I will make minor adjustments here and there. If not, even better. What it all comes down to is treating yourself to the biggest cup of health you can! Remember: you don't have to starve yourself to lose weight! Good luck and happy taste buds to all -- !
[ Go back ]
|
Portion your meat out in plastic wrap, wax paper, and/or storage containers as soon as you bring it home from the store and freeze or refridgerate so it's ready when you are.
|
||||
![]() |
|||||
About Jenn | FAQ | Recipes | Photos | Favorite Products | Links | Contact | Home | Add to Favorites
Copyright ©2007
j3nn.net